Obama Spends 188 minutes (3hrs) at the Gym

OK let me get this straight. Barack Obama is a busy man; he has to convince the American people that he is the candidate for chope. I can image that his life is very busy with interviews, town-hall meeting, planning to convert America to Marxism.

What I found shocking is that Obama spends around 188 minutes a day at the gym. He went to SIX different gyms! I can see where all his campaign donations go.Yes its great to be fit and all, but is a three hour workout a little overboard? My question is, if Obama was president, would he postpone important National security meeting because he needs firm up his buttocks for photo opportunities? I know that Bush works out a lot also, but at least he does that early in the morning and it doesn’t take three hours.

null

Now this is not the only thing that bothered me when I read this article. Which you can read here. Is that ABC news would rather report on Barack Hussein Obama’s gym habits then ask why he is starting to flip-flop on major issues. Now that is poor reporting, and gives proof that the Media has biasness

The Media

The media is a wonderful tool keeps our freedoms. There is no better way to keep the government in line then the media. Whenever a offense or mistake is made, the incident is discovered quickly and reported. It is because of such a strong and free media that our country enjoys its freedom; however, what happens if the media is not so… honest.

It is true that journalist do put a slant on the stories they report. That is only human, but when entire networks are slanted and biased. Then there is a problem. It isn’t hard too see that this is true. Look at MSNBC, CNN, or Fox. Each one is slanted in one way or another. MSNBC and CNN are cesspools of liberal hype, but Fox News is a drone for the conservatives.

Don’t believe me? We all know who the stars of each news network are. Of course CNN does have Glenn Beck and Fox has Alan Colmes, but the other news casters tend to be the same ideology. Some people believe that having one or two opposing view points are enough diversity, but I don’t think so. Networks should be honest and show both sides of an issue. I hate when I watch CNN and all they have is shows or documentaries about Iraq war, and you can clearly see that it was created to slam Bush and the Right. I never heard anything positive about the Iraq war coming from CNN or MSNBC. All I hear is more and more troops are killed, and how everything is falling to pieces. Luckily, that is all changing.

With the surge working and Iraq stabilizing, it seems that there aren’t a whole lot of terrible things happening for CNN and MSNBC to criticize, so what do they do? They don’t report anything. They just find something else to cry and moan about. I just don’t understand why. Why doesn’t any one see this? I actually had one person say that the Far Right controls the media. I couldn’t stop laughing. Sometimes I can’t believe how blind people can be.

 Oh, lets not forget about my favorite news paper. The New York Times:

This is something they would write.

This is something they would write.

Barack H. Obama Big Spender! Bush’s Spending doesn’t Even Come Close to Obama Spending Plan.

He doesnt show it here, but Obama is going to be a BIG SPENDER

This is why the earth is heating up. Plastic bags and lot of hot air.

Analysis: Obama won’t try

for McCain’s budget goal.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama says John McCain’s plan to balance the budget doesn’t add up. Easy for him to say: It’s not a goal he’s even trying to reach.

Not only does Obama say he won’t eliminate the deficit in his first term, as McCain aims to do, he frankly says he’s not sure he’d bring it down at all in four years, considering his own spending plans.

"I do not make a promise that we can reduce it by 2013 because I think it is important for us to make some critical investments right now in America’s families," Obama told reporters this week when asked if he’d match McCain’s pledge.

So what is more important in tough economic times? For the government to spend more to help hard-hit Americans or to eliminate a deficit that can lead to higher borrowing costs and slow the economy?

Whether it’s McCain the Republican or Obama the Democrat in the White House next year, the new president is likely to inherit an annual federal deficit exceeding $400 billion. Budget watchers say it’s hard to figure what either candidate’s impact will be since neither is offering full details of his spending programs.

"I think both candidates need to put some numbers on these things so we can get a sense of how realistic they are," said Robert Bixby of the Concord Coalition, a budget watchdog group.

Obama’s criticism of McCain’s pledge as "overly ambitious" is backed up by fiscal experts.

"Hypothetically it’s possible to get to a balanced budget by 2013, but not under the policies that McCain has proposed," Bixby said. "The policies he would propose would actually add to the deficit when you take them all together."

Jim Horney, director of federal fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the center’s analysis, even assuming a fast drawdown of troops in Iraq, found McCain would have to cut around $400 billion worth of federal programs to balance the budget by 2013.

“It seems unlikely, particularly given that Senator McCain has not been willing to be specific about what programs he would cut,” Horney said. “And even if he were willing to, there’s a real question of whether the Congress or the public would go along with the kinds of cuts required to balance the budget, assuming the tax policies that he’s proposing.”

McCain says he would reduce spending by slowing the growth of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but he hasn’t said how he would try to change the benefits. He also says he would slow the government’s spending growth and stop spending on lawmakers’ special earmarked projects. But earmarks accounted for just $17 billion of the $2.9 trillion budget this year.

Obama plans to raise $100 billion annually by increasing taxes on Americans making more than $250,000 a year, money that would be used to pay for health care and tax cuts for low- and middle-income earners. He has said ending the Iraq war would generate about $80 billion a year, but he’s not using that to pay down the deficit either. Instead, he said that money could help pay for more government programs like health care, education, housing and public safety.

"The problem there is that the Democrats have been very critical of President Bush for spending hundreds of billions of dollars on the war without paying for it and running up the deficit," Bixby said. "But in effect what Obama is saying is, `I’m going to spend the same amount of money. I’m just going to spend it on something else.’"

Obama’s economic policy director, Jason Furman, said the campaign will release a formal budget later in the year that explains his spending in greater detail. Furman added that “while we would like to balance the budget, we cannot say exactly when that will happen given the need to make important investments and the large amount of uncertainty in the economy.”

Bixby said even if Obama and McCain have ways to pay for their spending plans, the United States still has an unsustainable budget outlook because of rising costs for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

"It’s kind of like somebody building a porch on a house they can’t afford," he said. "This is the part of the budget that’s poised to explode over the next several years. And we really can’t afford all of these new initiatives that McCain and Obama are talking about because we haven’t figured out how to pay for what’s already on the table."

 

My View

At least McCain is attempting to get this country out of debt. At least McCain is not trying to increase the taxes for anyone. At least McCain is trying to cut all the wasteful pork that Washington spews out every year. At least McCain is trying to show people that living off of the government is not the way to go.

Obama on the other hand… He just wants more spending. If you though Bush was bad at spending money. Obama’s spending will DWARF that of Bush’s spending levels. People complain about how much Bush spent money, yet no one will complain about Obama’s spending. Remember the Government should NOT take care of you! 

To the people who for some reason are too blind too see Barack Hussein Obama is truly a Marxist, just look at his two year record. Is it Social Security and Welfare really worth the increase of taxes and debt? My point of view. I say anyone over 45 is guaranteed social security. Anyone under that age should get start putting money away, of course with tax incentives.

Also people living on welfare, they would have six months to get off or be out on the street. I know there are people that truly need the help, and they should be helped. I just want to get the people who don’t work or try to find a job off welfare. These people need to be held accountable for their own financial situation, and they shouldn’t rely on my tax dollars!

 

Socialist Security

Socialist Security

Whats Going On?

Socialism+ Barack Obama= Poor Middle Class

Barack Hussein Obama was once the shining star of American Marxism. Barack Obama is a champion for a big, costly, but caring government. Only if you are a minority and don’t mind lots of taxes. Obama’s message of Chope (Change meeting Hope, the only two things he talks about) was giving mental orgasms to the liberals, but now their unwavering comrade is moving toward the center. The Marxist are slightly upset with him, but Obama is just doing what politicians do best. Flip-Flop.

How can this be? Barack Hussein Obama was supposed to be different from the idiots in Washington, yet here he is trying to change his views. Now Obama is supporting most of the faith based programs that Bush supported. Obama also agreed with the Supreme Courts ruling on the DC handgun band. I know what Barack Hussein Obama is doing. He is being a politician. He is no amazing movement leader that Obama and his group of drones want us to believe. He is an average, inexperienced, two year senator, and senators, as we all know, are naturally stupid people (Just look at Byrd)

I guess Obama’s message of Chope isn’t all what it was cracked up to be.

It wasn’t too hard to see that Obama was just an average politician. Look at how he handled the Reverend Wright issue. Yes I know that Howard Dean and John Kerry said that, any one that brings up the Rev. Wright issue is race baiting. Well I guess telling the truth is race baiting. Anyways, Obama handled that Rev. Wright situation sleazy politician.  As we all know, Obama supported and stood by Rev. Wright’s side. Obama said that Rev. Wright was is spiritual guide and baptized his children, but when Rev. Wright held that press conference. Barack Hussein Obama dropped Reverend Wright like a welfare-dependent-recipient drops a job, instantly.

Some liberals have the unisex genitalia to say that Obama never supported Rev. Wright. That Obama was proving that he was against Rev. Wright; however, we intelligent people know the truth. Barack Hussein Obama was just doing what politicians do when in trouble. Backstab friends, Lie, and spin the truth…

OBAMA LOVES TO TAX THE WORKING MAN!

SAY ONE THING, DO ANOTHER ON TAXES:

SAYS: ABC’s George Stephanopoulos: “Would you take the same pledge [that there will be no middle class tax increases of any kind]?” Obama: “Well, I not only have pledged not to raise their taxes, I’ve been the first candidate in this race to specifically say I would cut their taxes.” (ABC Democrat Candidates Presidential Debate, Philadelphia, PA, 4/16/08 )

* Obama: “I’ll Give A Tax Cut To Working People…” (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks At A Campaign Rally, Denver, CO, 1/30/08 )

DOES: Obama Voted Twice In Favor Of The Democrats’ FY 2009 Budget Resolution. (S. Con. Res. 70, CQ Vote #85, Adopted 51-44: R 2-43; D 47-1; I 2-0, 3/14/08, Obama Voted Yea; S. Con. Res. 70, CQ Vote #142: Adopted 48- 45: R 2- 44; D 44- 1; I 2-0, 6/4/08, Obama Voted Yea)

* The Democrats’ Budget Would Raise Taxes On Individuals Earning $31,850 Or More. “Under both Democratic plans, tax rates would increase by 3 percentage points for each of the 25 percent, 28 percent and 33 percent brackets. At present, the 25 percent bracket begins at $31,850 for individuals and $63,700 for married couples. The 35 percent bracket on incomes over $349,700 would jump to 39.6 percent.” ( Andrew Taylor, “Presidential Hopefuls To Vote On Budget,” The Associated Press, 3/13/08 )

SAYS: Obama: “First of all, I don’t want higher taxes, I have to pay taxes, and it’s no fun. You know I think sometimes there’s this presumption that Democrats, we just love taxing people. No, I would prefer to keep taxes as low as possible.” ( ABC’s “The View,” 3/28/08 )

DOES: Obama Voted At Least 94 Times For Higher Taxes In The U.S. Senate. (RNC Research)

* To Date, Obama Has Voted For A Tax Increase Approximately Once Every Five Days Congress Has Been In Session. (RNC Research; The Library Of Congress Website, thomas.loc.gov, Accessed 6/8/08 )

Sounds like Obama is saying that he is for the common man, yet his tax polices say something very different!

Barack Hussein Obama for Chope (Change meeting Hope)

I guess it is Obama who is the nominee. Hillary is just out (even though she can win the white vote and Obama can not) and all Democrats need to follow the Antichrist, excuse me, Obama.

But will Obama win the election, I’m going to say no. For the reason is, look at West Virginia. He lost by a HUGE margin. Some people say it was racism, that white people do not want to vote for a black man. I say no, I say that those people saw through his double speak to see the real person. The real Obama. Obama the politician, Obama the racist. Isn’t surprising that he receives 90 percent of the black vote, and the states he normally wins has a huge black population? Of course die hard Obama lovers will say “He is an agent for Hope and Change, He is going to Change Washington. He will Hope for a better life. Obama will Change the world.” I laugh when I hear this garbage. What is going to do. Rub a lamp and make three wishes? Obama speeches are mental masturbation for liberals. All filler and no action. Isn’t that a true Liberal? All talk and no freakin’ action. Do as I say not as I do? Obama says these wonderful words and phrases. He talks about equality and how he stands for change and progress. God I can see why Liberals love him so damn much. Just hearing those Um’s and Ahhs, must be a turn on.

Whats going on with the Democrats?

If you live under a rock, you wouldn’t have known that Barack Obama won North Carolina by a huge margin, thanks to the Black Vote. But in Indiana, it was a different story. Hillary Clinton won but only by a few points. What carried her was the white, blue collar voters.

What does this mean? Hillary lost one state and gained another. Is she going to call it quits? Personally I don’t think she will. I am thinking she’ll throw in the towel around June, and not earlier. People are telling her to quit, but she still has plenty of fight left. She has been able to turn around major defeats, and she is still giving Obama a run for his money. But this is not enough. Each day it seems more delegates are choosing Obama, and each day is a tougher battle for Hillary to win. I really don’t think she’ll get the nominee, but she is trying hard. Maybe West Virginia or Kentucky will finally put Hillary out of her misery. How knows. Ever time there is a major primary, people say it is the end all be all, and Hillary still manages to stay in. Maybe these next primaries, Hillary might just say it is over and leave the race.

Or Hillary might get two wins. Because both West Virginia and Kentucky have a huge rural, white, and blue collar voting base, and we all know Obama just can’t get those votes.

Take the Quiz

Progressive Liberals for Closed Mindedness

My View:

You are a corporate neo-Nazi because you believe the Nazis were Socialists!

You are a church-going hillbilly because you doubt the fact that global warming is caused by American capitalism!

You are a heartless cretin because you oppose government regulation of economy

These sayings are all jokes from the Peoplescube, yet the more I see these randomly generated liberal lines. I actually see that some progressive liberals would actually say stuff like that.

Lets take the global warming one. You only hear how the United States of America is evil and terrible that we didn’t sign the Kyoto Treaty, or that it is the USA that is causing all the global warming. Doesn’t any one blame China for building 1 coal power plant per week; by the way one coal plant dumps 1.4 million tons of CO2 per year? Of course not! It is USA fault for not spend enough money to take care of China’s pollution. We, the USA, must spend our tax dollars to clean up the whole world, no matter who is a fault. If we don’t the world will say the exact words Reverend Wright used “Goddamn America!”

What I am trying to say is that Progressive Liberals believe in equality and are opened minded, yet if you bring up a conservative point of view, no matter how nice, innocent, and correct. They instantly turn into closed-minded babbling idiots. That just spew propaganda from hippie militants like the Weather Underground, ACLU, Obama, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and so on (and they though Republicans are mindless)

I wish progressive liberals could be the understanding folks they say they are. Maybe they should actually listen to conservative view points with an open mind. Not with an open mouth.

Miley Cyrus Vanity Fair Fiasco

Miley Cyrus a role model to girls, has been put into question on the Tuesday. The photos taken in magazine, Vanity Fair, have caused quite a ruckus. Some people are outraged and even went as far to call the photos taken by a world celebrated photographer, Annie Leibovitz, kiddy-porn. Then there are other people that found the artistic meaning behind the photos and have a general appreciation for them.

Whatever the cause, Miley Cyrus will not be joining her fellow co-actors at Disney’s red carpet event on Friday. She was to appear at a media party for the “Disney Channel Games” along with other Disney Channel actors, but as the AP reports Miley’s presence is no longer expected. Disney has not issued any statements at this time.

I don’t think Miley knew how bad those photos could affect her career. I have seen those photos online. While the photos do not expose any private parts of her body or have her in provocative poses. It may make some uncomfortable for some to look at, because she is only 15 years-old.