Category Archives: Uncategorized

My father broke his arm while in high school. The next day, he saw his doctor. The doctor took the X-ray, set the bone, and wrapped the arm in a cast. A half-day later, the entire procedure was completed. My grandparents only paid a few hundred dollars for everything and my father went on with his day.

I broke my finger back in Jr. High. The following day, I went to see my doctor. He put a temporary splint and sent me to a specialist. The specialist sent me to have an X-ray done. A Radiologic Technologists took the X-ray and sent me back to the specialist.

The specialist looked at the X-ray. He said my finger was fractured. He finally put a durable splint on my finger and I went home at 4:30pm.

My procedure took the entire day and cost more than 1000 dollars.  I wondered why my broken finger took an entire day to fix, yet my father’s broken arm took half. A broken arm is a serious medical condition compared to a broken finger, yet his procedure cost less time and money.  I understand it was in the 70s and a few hundred dollars was expensive; however, why did I have to see three different people? While my father saw one?

When my dad broke his arm, his parents only paid the doctor to do everything, but when I broke my finger my parents paid three different people. I understand there are times when it is paramount to see different types of specialist, for example cancer, yet when is it necessary for three different healthcare providers to fix something as simple as hairline fracture on a finger?

And People in the USA think lethal injection is cruel.

And People in the USA think lethal injection is cruel.

While the USA elected a young and untested president. The world is gearing up to test the nerves of Obama. Russia, Iran, and Israel. Each one of those nations has a problem that could-at one point- cause an international crisis. Iran, after a 29 year diplomatic boycott has sent its congratulations to Obama. Ahmadinejad called for Obama to change current US policies concerning Iran. Ahmadinejad wants the sanctions removed as a sign of goodwill.

Israel, however, is against this. Israel stated that if Obama eases up on the sanctions or opens lines of communication. That Iran would consider Obama as weak. Iran wanted a president Obama, because they think Obama is ‘flexible‘. Lastly Russia is now willing to put warheads along the Polish boarder if Obama continues Bush’s missile shield. 

This is a whole heck of a lot for Barack Obama. Just recently Obama was just a senator, and before that a state senator. I know the entire media bashed Palin for her lack of foreign policy experience, but Obama doesn’t have any either. I hope that Obama show some backbone and keep up the pressure on Iran, and show Russia that he does have a backbone. I just fear that Obama will try to follow the failed Neville Chamberlain diplomacy of appeasement.

 Joe Biden gaffe strikes again!

“Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy and they’re going to find out this guy’s got steel in his spine. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy. He’s gonna have to make some really tough – I don’t know what the decision’s gonna be, but I promise you it will occur. As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it’s gonna happen. I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate. And he’s gonna need help… because it’s not going to be apparent initially; it’s not going to be apparent that we’re right-Joe Biden aka Obiden

What does that mean!? The USA will have an international crisis on its hands and that Obama will apparently make a wrong decision, but in the long run will be right?! Does anyone else see something wrong there? Biden is saying the Obama will be tested and picked on by the bullies of the world. And no matter what decision Barack chooses we, the American people, will have to bite our tongues and just follow Obama blindly. If Biden is saying such things, why the hell would you vote for Obama/Obiden? Why vote for a candidate might not be able to handle a devastating crisis? I believe Biden wants something to happen, so that Biden can step in and save the day. Why else would he say such things? Maybe he just likes making gaffes.

There will be some that will comment and say that Sarah Palin will be tested. That Sarah will not be able to handle an international crisis. My response is: Then what about Obama? Obama was a community organizer! How does working in Chicago help one become a president? What huge crisis did Obama help prevent or deal with? I know many of you believe Sarah will not have the mettle to deal with a crisis, but I will throw the same argument back at you. Sarah was a governor, even if it was four years. She still has more executive experience, and at least she is proud of our country. Considering that Obama worked for the crooks in Acorn and has American-hating terrorist buddies (Ayers, Farrakhan, and Rev. Wright). So the question is: will Obama fight the good fight for the survival of the American People?

Remember folks. If Obama/Obiden is elected we will have to bite our tongues and just deal with their socialism and their failures. Cause if you don’t trust the decisions of Comrade Obama/Obiden; your a gun-clinging, bible thumping, bitter, racist!

 

 The Left wants your money and your freedoms. Barack Obama is just the beginning of a dark storm of Marxism and unrelenting liberalism. Imagine a country where political correctness is king. A government that tells how raise your own child. A nation that college students have no freedom to choose a major in college (this happens in Europe).

A government that tells you what your future will hold. A nation where religion is ridiculed and is forced regulated to be inline with the state. A country where the poor are kept poor and Obama and his comrades stay in power and bask in wealth.

 

Obama wants to help the poor. Barack wants to make you and me dependent on the government. Barack wants to increase social spending too help the people in poverty. People, welfare does not help the poor. Why would someone work, if they can get free money from Uncle Sam?

If you want to help the poor give them the will to work. It is only through hard work and determination that will give people economic freedom. It is capitalism that will be the salvation for poor. People, who put in the hours, get the education, innovate, or have the will too succeed. Will find out they are free from the grasp of poverty.

If welfare doesn’t help the poor, then why does Obama want to spend more for it? Is Obama a misguided idealist that is inexperienced? Or is there something else? We all know during elections that every politician wants to make the world a better place and promise everything in the world for your vote.  There is some other agenda that Obama must be pursing. Just look to his past. William Ayers, Louis Farrakhan, and Reverend Wright are, at one point or another, were Obama’s close friends. These people are against the American way are twisted by the failed ideology of the left; however, Obama says that he is for the common man. Then why be even associated with these scum bags of our society? William Ayer was a terrorist. Ayer’s bombed the pentagon, sided with North Vietnam, and said he would DO IT AGAIN. He is nothing but an arrogant terrorist! Farrakhan is a perfect example of reverse racism. Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam wants to establish a new nation where Islam is the rule of the land (same as Islamic-fascist), and we all know about Reverend Wright and what he thinks about our nation.

 People, I beg you too look further. There is something more sinister to Obama’s goals then he is leading on. I believe Barack wants to remodel the USA into a nation where the constitution is based off the ideals of Liberalism. I believe Barack might not completely change the entire nation, but he will get the ball rolling, and if Americans are scared enough we might live in the People’s Demokratic Republik of the United States of Amerika. Yesterday we had a taste of his Marxist ideology. Spread the wealth around. Obama wants to punish the people that work hard and the successful, and reward the lazy and unproductive. McCain isn’t the most conservative candidate, but he is a hell of a lot better then the Marxist and his crew.

Obama/Biden for Marxism 2008!

OK let me get this straight. Barack Obama is a busy man; he has to convince the American people that he is the candidate for chope. I can image that his life is very busy with interviews, town-hall meeting, planning to convert America to Marxism.

What I found shocking is that Obama spends around 188 minutes a day at the gym. He went to SIX different gyms! I can see where all his campaign donations go.Yes its great to be fit and all, but is a three hour workout a little overboard? My question is, if Obama was president, would he postpone important National security meeting because he needs firm up his buttocks for photo opportunities? I know that Bush works out a lot also, but at least he does that early in the morning and it doesn’t take three hours.

null

Now this is not the only thing that bothered me when I read this article. Which you can read here. Is that ABC news would rather report on Barack Hussein Obama’s gym habits then ask why he is starting to flip-flop on major issues. Now that is poor reporting, and gives proof that the Media has biasness

The media is a wonderful tool keeps our freedoms. There is no better way to keep the government in line then the media. Whenever a offense or mistake is made, the incident is discovered quickly and reported. It is because of such a strong and free media that our country enjoys its freedom; however, what happens if the media is not so… honest.

It is true that journalist do put a slant on the stories they report. That is only human, but when entire networks are slanted and biased. Then there is a problem. It isn’t hard too see that this is true. Look at MSNBC, CNN, or Fox. Each one is slanted in one way or another. MSNBC and CNN are cesspools of liberal hype, but Fox News is a drone for the conservatives.

Don’t believe me? We all know who the stars of each news network are. Of course CNN does have Glenn Beck and Fox has Alan Colmes, but the other news casters tend to be the same ideology. Some people believe that having one or two opposing view points are enough diversity, but I don’t think so. Networks should be honest and show both sides of an issue. I hate when I watch CNN and all they have is shows or documentaries about Iraq war, and you can clearly see that it was created to slam Bush and the Right. I never heard anything positive about the Iraq war coming from CNN or MSNBC. All I hear is more and more troops are killed, and how everything is falling to pieces. Luckily, that is all changing.

With the surge working and Iraq stabilizing, it seems that there aren’t a whole lot of terrible things happening for CNN and MSNBC to criticize, so what do they do? They don’t report anything. They just find something else to cry and moan about. I just don’t understand why. Why doesn’t any one see this? I actually had one person say that the Far Right controls the media. I couldn’t stop laughing. Sometimes I can’t believe how blind people can be.

 Oh, lets not forget about my favorite news paper. The New York Times:

This is something they would write.

This is something they would write.

He doesnt show it here, but Obama is going to be a BIG SPENDER

This is why the earth is heating up. Plastic bags and lot of hot air.

Analysis: Obama won’t try

for McCain’s budget goal.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama says John McCain’s plan to balance the budget doesn’t add up. Easy for him to say: It’s not a goal he’s even trying to reach.

Not only does Obama say he won’t eliminate the deficit in his first term, as McCain aims to do, he frankly says he’s not sure he’d bring it down at all in four years, considering his own spending plans.

"I do not make a promise that we can reduce it by 2013 because I think it is important for us to make some critical investments right now in America’s families," Obama told reporters this week when asked if he’d match McCain’s pledge.

So what is more important in tough economic times? For the government to spend more to help hard-hit Americans or to eliminate a deficit that can lead to higher borrowing costs and slow the economy?

Whether it’s McCain the Republican or Obama the Democrat in the White House next year, the new president is likely to inherit an annual federal deficit exceeding $400 billion. Budget watchers say it’s hard to figure what either candidate’s impact will be since neither is offering full details of his spending programs.

"I think both candidates need to put some numbers on these things so we can get a sense of how realistic they are," said Robert Bixby of the Concord Coalition, a budget watchdog group.

Obama’s criticism of McCain’s pledge as "overly ambitious" is backed up by fiscal experts.

"Hypothetically it’s possible to get to a balanced budget by 2013, but not under the policies that McCain has proposed," Bixby said. "The policies he would propose would actually add to the deficit when you take them all together."

Jim Horney, director of federal fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the center’s analysis, even assuming a fast drawdown of troops in Iraq, found McCain would have to cut around $400 billion worth of federal programs to balance the budget by 2013.

“It seems unlikely, particularly given that Senator McCain has not been willing to be specific about what programs he would cut,” Horney said. “And even if he were willing to, there’s a real question of whether the Congress or the public would go along with the kinds of cuts required to balance the budget, assuming the tax policies that he’s proposing.”

McCain says he would reduce spending by slowing the growth of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but he hasn’t said how he would try to change the benefits. He also says he would slow the government’s spending growth and stop spending on lawmakers’ special earmarked projects. But earmarks accounted for just $17 billion of the $2.9 trillion budget this year.

Obama plans to raise $100 billion annually by increasing taxes on Americans making more than $250,000 a year, money that would be used to pay for health care and tax cuts for low- and middle-income earners. He has said ending the Iraq war would generate about $80 billion a year, but he’s not using that to pay down the deficit either. Instead, he said that money could help pay for more government programs like health care, education, housing and public safety.

"The problem there is that the Democrats have been very critical of President Bush for spending hundreds of billions of dollars on the war without paying for it and running up the deficit," Bixby said. "But in effect what Obama is saying is, `I’m going to spend the same amount of money. I’m just going to spend it on something else.’"

Obama’s economic policy director, Jason Furman, said the campaign will release a formal budget later in the year that explains his spending in greater detail. Furman added that “while we would like to balance the budget, we cannot say exactly when that will happen given the need to make important investments and the large amount of uncertainty in the economy.”

Bixby said even if Obama and McCain have ways to pay for their spending plans, the United States still has an unsustainable budget outlook because of rising costs for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

"It’s kind of like somebody building a porch on a house they can’t afford," he said. "This is the part of the budget that’s poised to explode over the next several years. And we really can’t afford all of these new initiatives that McCain and Obama are talking about because we haven’t figured out how to pay for what’s already on the table."

 

My View

At least McCain is attempting to get this country out of debt. At least McCain is not trying to increase the taxes for anyone. At least McCain is trying to cut all the wasteful pork that Washington spews out every year. At least McCain is trying to show people that living off of the government is not the way to go.

Obama on the other hand… He just wants more spending. If you though Bush was bad at spending money. Obama’s spending will DWARF that of Bush’s spending levels. People complain about how much Bush spent money, yet no one will complain about Obama’s spending. Remember the Government should NOT take care of you! 

To the people who for some reason are too blind too see Barack Hussein Obama is truly a Marxist, just look at his two year record. Is it Social Security and Welfare really worth the increase of taxes and debt? My point of view. I say anyone over 45 is guaranteed social security. Anyone under that age should get start putting money away, of course with tax incentives.

Also people living on welfare, they would have six months to get off or be out on the street. I know there are people that truly need the help, and they should be helped. I just want to get the people who don’t work or try to find a job off welfare. These people need to be held accountable for their own financial situation, and they shouldn’t rely on my tax dollars!

 

Socialist Security

Socialist Security

If you live under a rock, you wouldn’t have known that Barack Obama won North Carolina by a huge margin, thanks to the Black Vote. But in Indiana, it was a different story. Hillary Clinton won but only by a few points. What carried her was the white, blue collar voters.

What does this mean? Hillary lost one state and gained another. Is she going to call it quits? Personally I don’t think she will. I am thinking she’ll throw in the towel around June, and not earlier. People are telling her to quit, but she still has plenty of fight left. She has been able to turn around major defeats, and she is still giving Obama a run for his money. But this is not enough. Each day it seems more delegates are choosing Obama, and each day is a tougher battle for Hillary to win. I really don’t think she’ll get the nominee, but she is trying hard. Maybe West Virginia or Kentucky will finally put Hillary out of her misery. How knows. Ever time there is a major primary, people say it is the end all be all, and Hillary still manages to stay in. Maybe these next primaries, Hillary might just say it is over and leave the race.

Or Hillary might get two wins. Because both West Virginia and Kentucky have a huge rural, white, and blue collar voting base, and we all know Obama just can’t get those votes.

Obama too Cool for USA

My View

Once upon a time, Hillary Clinton had the Democratic Nomination in her back pocket. Everything was going so swell. Believing she could build off of her husband’s popularity. Clinton had high hopes. Then a man by the name of Barack Obama stepped on to the seen. Obama was different; he did not talk specifically about important issues. Instead Obama talked about formless ideals like “hope” and “change”. The world viewed Obama as manna from heaven. Is this man really going to change Washington? Will he unite all Americans under the banner of hope and change? Will he make America a better nation?

These where the questions we simple folk asked and pondered. Hillary, a battle-tested and scarred politician, that many viewed as too damn polarized. Hillary was unable to adapt against a person that only speaks feel good rhetoric. Hillary could only win people that supported Hillary Clinton. While Barack Obama on the other hand, seemed to have a King Midas touch, whoever Obama talked too, they converted believed in his feel good rhetorical ideals. Originally Hillary thought she would easily win this election. Now Hillary is in a fight a man that has the ability to make people faint at speeches.

Fast forward to May first. Hillary has suffered defeat after defeat at the hands of Obama, yet a brief ray of hope pierced the battlegrounds.  Less then two weeks ago, Hillary won an important state. Pennsylvania. It was because of this win that she was able to breathe new life into her campaign, yet that wasn’t enough to convince the Gods of the Democratic Party. There is still news that many of the delegates are going to support Obama, no matter who wins Indiana or North Carolina

Today Hillary Clinton has lost another superdelegate to Obama’s camp. To make it ever more personal, this superdelegate was the leader DNC under Bill Clinton. Adding an insult to injury, superdelegate Joe Andrew, told all the delegates to decide on a candidate and end this bloodbath. The two main reasons why Andrew switched is because Obama handled the Reverend Wright issues very professionally and that Obama was against the gasoline tax break during the summer. These two acts showed Andrews that Obama had political guts to stand against the norm.

Obama seemed to have captured the imaginations of all the people whom he speaks to. Yes Obama had his sort comings. Like being in a church for 20 years with a racist pastor, yet all Obama had to do is say that he is “offended by him,” and just distance himself away That’s it, all problems are solved with Reverend Wright.

It is amazing how many people are willing to stand up for Obama. All Obama needs to do is to close his eyes and wish all the problems way, and poof! All his campaign problems disappear and the American people instantly forget everything he has said and done, and just continue to sing his praises. For Obama has the media and left-wing radicals kissing the ground he walks on, and are willing to do anything for him. For example, John Kerry said today, that we must not dwell on Reverend Wright, and that we should leave it in the past. I can only begin to wonder how Obama’s presidency will be when he makes a mistake. From what I am seeing now, no one will care. Obama could allow the USA to be taken over by another country and the Democrats will still sing him praises.