Tag Archives: Barack Hussein Obama

Alright

It has been too long since I wrote on this blog. After a crushing defeat in the 2008 elections; the Republicans are leaderless, confused, and (most importantly) lost their way. Now we have Comrade Barack Hussein Obama as our Controller-in-Chief of the United Socialist States of America. His radical beliefs are coming out, and coming out strong. In the past few months we have passed THE LARGEST SPENDING BILL IN WORLD HISTORY, yet as good Americans we did not ask questions. We just simply followed our Messiah. Obama was promising change and hope (AKA Chope). From his campaign speeches, it sounded like the moment he would step into office. All the problems of the earthy would be fixed.

Two months later…

Something did change

Now the USA deficit has never been higher (and you liberals were complaining about Bush’s spending)

The economy is still failing, jobs are being lost at record numbers, and unemployment is at 8.1 percent. This isn’t change but more of the same, so much Obama’s campaign promise of “change we can believe in.”

 Iran for Obama!

Those people in Iran love the USA!!

Those people in Iran love the USA!!

Islamic-Fascism and militant socialism are gridding their axes, in preparation for a future conflict with American ideals. This is the time to stand strong and untied. The United States of America must be ready and willing to deal with all those who want to cause harm. IN this era we are no longer fighting for land, but our very way of life.

As I watch the political quagmire boil and fester. I cannot help but be disgusted. I find myself wondering. Are these candidates really what we need? I know that I am leaning toward John McCain, but he never came close to the candidate I really wanted. I would love to vote for Bob Barr, yet, in the US elections, voting for a third party candidate is like throwing away your vote. Then there is Barack Obama. Now if you have been reading this blog for awhile you should know. I am not a big fan of Barack Obama, and the article above, reaffirms my view on Obama.

Iran’s parliament speaker, Ali Larijani, said that they support Barack Obama. His reason is that he finds Obama ‘flexible and rational’. Great, not only is Barack Obama a Marxist, but now has the backing and support of one the world’s brutal nations. Was it not Iran whose revolutionary guard helped sneak insurgent fighters and weapons into Iraq, with the intention to kill US soldiers? Is it not Iran that wants Israel wiped off the face of the earth? This is the country that enjoys burning and stomping on the US flag, and the leaders and people of Iran chant “death to America!” Larijani calls Barack Obama ‘flexible’ or in other terms weak and easily manipulated.

The USA needs a president that will not be another nation’s naïve puppet.  We need a strong president that is not flexible. The question is this. Will Obama be a pawn in the great game of international politics? I know that Barack’s running mate, Joe Biden, believes that Obama will have a tough time, yet, I heard some people say, Barack will have many advisers on foreign policy, so he doesn’t need to have experience. Having advisers doesn’t mean jack. If other countries think that you are weak, they will exploit that weakness. Obama does not have any real world foreign policy experience. Remember this is the guy at one moment wanted undivided Israeli country and the next supported a two-state option to deal with the Israel-Palestine problem.

My view is that we need a president that does have foreign policy skills. Our next president must rely on his own skills not those of advisers. In this world of Islamic-Fascism and Militant Socialism, we need to have a president that will not be flexible to the world dictators. We need a president that will not talk or bend to the will of tyrants. We cannot afford to have a president that will follow the ideals of appeasement like Neville Chamberlain and his famous 1938 quote ‘Peace in Our Time’(a year later WWII started). Sadly, I see Barack Obama, not being strong enough or independent enough for our nation and global politics. I see Obama as following the failed ideologies of Appeasement and Socialism.

Here is my question about liberalism. They preach about tolerance, equality, and diversity. They view conservatism as backwards, projectors of class-warfare, and chauvinistic pigs. I don’t understand why they think that, because they do the same thing!

They believe that they’re leading America into a better, more progressive future. What I see is a group of people that their fundamental philosophy is “Do as I say, Not as I do” which anyone can plainly see every time on of these ‘progressives’ try to influence the American public. An example of this is the intelligent design theory. I understand that some people think this theory is pathetic excuse to try to teach about God in school, yet it does bring up the hypocrisy of liberalism. Liberals fight constantly against the supporters of the Intelligent Design theory. Liberals believe Intelligent Design is a sneaky way for conservatives to teach about God in schools. I don’t understand why liberals get so mad. Aren’t liberals supposed to be people with open minds and the agents of tolerance? These are the same people that want to teach sex education to kindergartners.  Liberals say that conservatives supposed the agents of intolerance, so why are they being so intolerant too the Intelligent Design theory?

By now I hope you see the hypocrisy. Liberals are open-minded and tolerant if it is something that they agree with, like Planned Parenthood, socialism, taxes, atheism, and Barack Obama. If anyone contradicts any of their ‘progressive’ ideas; liberals take their media friends and try to annihilate reputation of progressivism enemies with familiar labels like bigot, racist, closed-minded, and sexist just to name a few.

When you hear a liberal say that ‘conservatives are (insert random insult)‘ remember to smile. Point out their liberal hypocrisy and before they respond. Make sure you tell them they can’t response with bumper-sticker slogan. That is the fastest way to shut them up.

OK let me get this straight. Barack Obama is a busy man; he has to convince the American people that he is the candidate for chope. I can image that his life is very busy with interviews, town-hall meeting, planning to convert America to Marxism.

What I found shocking is that Obama spends around 188 minutes a day at the gym. He went to SIX different gyms! I can see where all his campaign donations go.Yes its great to be fit and all, but is a three hour workout a little overboard? My question is, if Obama was president, would he postpone important National security meeting because he needs firm up his buttocks for photo opportunities? I know that Bush works out a lot also, but at least he does that early in the morning and it doesn’t take three hours.

null

Now this is not the only thing that bothered me when I read this article. Which you can read here. Is that ABC news would rather report on Barack Hussein Obama’s gym habits then ask why he is starting to flip-flop on major issues. Now that is poor reporting, and gives proof that the Media has biasness

He doesnt show it here, but Obama is going to be a BIG SPENDER

This is why the earth is heating up. Plastic bags and lot of hot air.

Analysis: Obama won’t try

for McCain’s budget goal.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama says John McCain’s plan to balance the budget doesn’t add up. Easy for him to say: It’s not a goal he’s even trying to reach.

Not only does Obama say he won’t eliminate the deficit in his first term, as McCain aims to do, he frankly says he’s not sure he’d bring it down at all in four years, considering his own spending plans.

"I do not make a promise that we can reduce it by 2013 because I think it is important for us to make some critical investments right now in America’s families," Obama told reporters this week when asked if he’d match McCain’s pledge.

So what is more important in tough economic times? For the government to spend more to help hard-hit Americans or to eliminate a deficit that can lead to higher borrowing costs and slow the economy?

Whether it’s McCain the Republican or Obama the Democrat in the White House next year, the new president is likely to inherit an annual federal deficit exceeding $400 billion. Budget watchers say it’s hard to figure what either candidate’s impact will be since neither is offering full details of his spending programs.

"I think both candidates need to put some numbers on these things so we can get a sense of how realistic they are," said Robert Bixby of the Concord Coalition, a budget watchdog group.

Obama’s criticism of McCain’s pledge as "overly ambitious" is backed up by fiscal experts.

"Hypothetically it’s possible to get to a balanced budget by 2013, but not under the policies that McCain has proposed," Bixby said. "The policies he would propose would actually add to the deficit when you take them all together."

Jim Horney, director of federal fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the center’s analysis, even assuming a fast drawdown of troops in Iraq, found McCain would have to cut around $400 billion worth of federal programs to balance the budget by 2013.

“It seems unlikely, particularly given that Senator McCain has not been willing to be specific about what programs he would cut,” Horney said. “And even if he were willing to, there’s a real question of whether the Congress or the public would go along with the kinds of cuts required to balance the budget, assuming the tax policies that he’s proposing.”

McCain says he would reduce spending by slowing the growth of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but he hasn’t said how he would try to change the benefits. He also says he would slow the government’s spending growth and stop spending on lawmakers’ special earmarked projects. But earmarks accounted for just $17 billion of the $2.9 trillion budget this year.

Obama plans to raise $100 billion annually by increasing taxes on Americans making more than $250,000 a year, money that would be used to pay for health care and tax cuts for low- and middle-income earners. He has said ending the Iraq war would generate about $80 billion a year, but he’s not using that to pay down the deficit either. Instead, he said that money could help pay for more government programs like health care, education, housing and public safety.

"The problem there is that the Democrats have been very critical of President Bush for spending hundreds of billions of dollars on the war without paying for it and running up the deficit," Bixby said. "But in effect what Obama is saying is, `I’m going to spend the same amount of money. I’m just going to spend it on something else.’"

Obama’s economic policy director, Jason Furman, said the campaign will release a formal budget later in the year that explains his spending in greater detail. Furman added that “while we would like to balance the budget, we cannot say exactly when that will happen given the need to make important investments and the large amount of uncertainty in the economy.”

Bixby said even if Obama and McCain have ways to pay for their spending plans, the United States still has an unsustainable budget outlook because of rising costs for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

"It’s kind of like somebody building a porch on a house they can’t afford," he said. "This is the part of the budget that’s poised to explode over the next several years. And we really can’t afford all of these new initiatives that McCain and Obama are talking about because we haven’t figured out how to pay for what’s already on the table."

 

My View

At least McCain is attempting to get this country out of debt. At least McCain is not trying to increase the taxes for anyone. At least McCain is trying to cut all the wasteful pork that Washington spews out every year. At least McCain is trying to show people that living off of the government is not the way to go.

Obama on the other hand… He just wants more spending. If you though Bush was bad at spending money. Obama’s spending will DWARF that of Bush’s spending levels. People complain about how much Bush spent money, yet no one will complain about Obama’s spending. Remember the Government should NOT take care of you! 

To the people who for some reason are too blind too see Barack Hussein Obama is truly a Marxist, just look at his two year record. Is it Social Security and Welfare really worth the increase of taxes and debt? My point of view. I say anyone over 45 is guaranteed social security. Anyone under that age should get start putting money away, of course with tax incentives.

Also people living on welfare, they would have six months to get off or be out on the street. I know there are people that truly need the help, and they should be helped. I just want to get the people who don’t work or try to find a job off welfare. These people need to be held accountable for their own financial situation, and they shouldn’t rely on my tax dollars!

 

Socialist Security

Socialist Security

Socialism+ Barack Obama= Poor Middle Class

Barack Hussein Obama was once the shining star of American Marxism. Barack Obama is a champion for a big, costly, but caring government. Only if you are a minority and don’t mind lots of taxes. Obama’s message of Chope (Change meeting Hope, the only two things he talks about) was giving mental orgasms to the liberals, but now their unwavering comrade is moving toward the center. The Marxist are slightly upset with him, but Obama is just doing what politicians do best. Flip-Flop.

How can this be? Barack Hussein Obama was supposed to be different from the idiots in Washington, yet here he is trying to change his views. Now Obama is supporting most of the faith based programs that Bush supported. Obama also agreed with the Supreme Courts ruling on the DC handgun band. I know what Barack Hussein Obama is doing. He is being a politician. He is no amazing movement leader that Obama and his group of drones want us to believe. He is an average, inexperienced, two year senator, and senators, as we all know, are naturally stupid people (Just look at Byrd)

I guess Obama’s message of Chope isn’t all what it was cracked up to be.

It wasn’t too hard to see that Obama was just an average politician. Look at how he handled the Reverend Wright issue. Yes I know that Howard Dean and John Kerry said that, any one that brings up the Rev. Wright issue is race baiting. Well I guess telling the truth is race baiting. Anyways, Obama handled that Rev. Wright situation sleazy politician.  As we all know, Obama supported and stood by Rev. Wright’s side. Obama said that Rev. Wright was is spiritual guide and baptized his children, but when Rev. Wright held that press conference. Barack Hussein Obama dropped Reverend Wright like a welfare-dependent-recipient drops a job, instantly.

Some liberals have the unisex genitalia to say that Obama never supported Rev. Wright. That Obama was proving that he was against Rev. Wright; however, we intelligent people know the truth. Barack Hussein Obama was just doing what politicians do when in trouble. Backstab friends, Lie, and spin the truth…