Iran for Barack Obama

 Iran for Obama!

Those people in Iran love the USA!!

Islamic-Fascism and militant socialism are gridding their axes, in preparation for a future conflict with American ideals. This is the time to stand strong and untied. The United States of America must be ready and willing to deal with all those who want to cause harm. IN this era we are no longer fighting for land, but our very way of life.

As I watch the political quagmire boil and fester. I cannot help but be disgusted. I find myself wondering. Are these candidates really what we need? I know that I am leaning toward John McCain, but he never came close to the candidate I really wanted. I would love to vote for Bob Barr, yet, in the US elections, voting for a third party candidate is like throwing away your vote. Then there is Barack Obama. Now if you have been reading this blog for awhile you should know. I am not a big fan of Barack Obama, and the article above, reaffirms my view on Obama.

Iran’s parliament speaker, Ali Larijani, said that they support Barack Obama. His reason is that he finds Obama ‘flexible and rational’. Great, not only is Barack Obama a Marxist, but now has the backing and support of one the world’s brutal nations. Was it not Iran whose revolutionary guard helped sneak insurgent fighters and weapons into Iraq, with the intention to kill US soldiers? Is it not Iran that wants Israel wiped off the face of the earth? This is the country that enjoys burning and stomping on the US flag, and the leaders and people of Iran chant “death to America!” Larijani calls Barack Obama ‘flexible’ or in other terms weak and easily manipulated.

The USA needs a president that will not be another nation’s naïve puppet.  We need a strong president that is not flexible. The question is this. Will Obama be a pawn in the great game of international politics? I know that Barack’s running mate, Joe Biden, believes that Obama will have a tough time, yet, I heard some people say, Barack will have many advisers on foreign policy, so he doesn’t need to have experience. Having advisers doesn’t mean jack. If other countries think that you are weak, they will exploit that weakness. Obama does not have any real world foreign policy experience. Remember this is the guy at one moment wanted undivided Israeli country and the next supported a two-state option to deal with the Israel-Palestine problem.

My view is that we need a president that does have foreign policy skills. Our next president must rely on his own skills not those of advisers. In this world of Islamic-Fascism and Militant Socialism, we need to have a president that will not be flexible to the world dictators. We need a president that will not talk or bend to the will of tyrants. We cannot afford to have a president that will follow the ideals of appeasement like Neville Chamberlain and his famous 1938 quote ‘Peace in Our Time’(a year later WWII started). Sadly, I see Barack Obama, not being strong enough or independent enough for our nation and global politics. I see Obama as following the failed ideologies of Appeasement and Socialism.

Obama for Socialism!

The best thing in life is when my statements turn into fact. I have stated before in my previous post that Barack Obama is a socialist, wait, I mean Marxist. Socialist still believe in some private ownership and competition; however, Marxist believe in personality cults (like Obama’s campaign), wealth redistribution (like Obama’s economic policy), prejudiced equality (like Obama’s domestic policy), and my personal favorite a planned economy. Obama seems to be taking notes from history’s greatest dictators and failed ideologies.

In the video above, you have Joe the plumber who said to Obama that his little business would make more then 250,000 dollars a year. Obama has said that taxes will be raised on anyone making more then 250,000 a year, so Joe the plumber’s taxes will increase. We all know Obama is an eloquent speaker. Obama with his mastery of the English language, explained to Joe the plumber about his true economic plan: “My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

Spread the wealth around? Come on people. This has Marxism writing all over it! It is against our nation’s beliefs of capitalism! Our nation’s constitution encourages capitalism. Here is this man that is completely against our fundamental beliefs. The main reason why we are an economic powerhouse is because we value the free-market, yet people say that capitalism has failed us. Nothing could be further from the truth. Capitalism has never failed. The free-market will always right itself, and balance out. It is only when We the People fail to leave alone the market, does Capitalism appear to fail.

“Communism possesses a language which every people can understand – its elements are hunger, envy, and death.”- Heinrich Heine

Barack H. Obama Big Spender! Bush’s Spending doesn’t Even Come Close to Obama Spending Plan.

This is why the earth is heating up. Plastic bags and lot of hot air.

Analysis: Obama won’t try

for McCain’s budget goal.

 

By NEDRA PICKLER – 5 days ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama says John McCain’s plan to balance the budget doesn’t add up. Easy for him to say: It’s not a goal he’s even trying to reach.

Not only does Obama say he won’t eliminate the deficit in his first term, as McCain aims to do, he frankly says he’s not sure he’d bring it down at all in four years, considering his own spending plans.

"I do not make a promise that we can reduce it by 2013 because I think it is important for us to make some critical investments right now in America’s families," Obama told reporters this week when asked if he’d match McCain’s pledge.

So what is more important in tough economic times? For the government to spend more to help hard-hit Americans or to eliminate a deficit that can lead to higher borrowing costs and slow the economy?

Whether it’s McCain the Republican or Obama the Democrat in the White House next year, the new president is likely to inherit an annual federal deficit exceeding $400 billion. Budget watchers say it’s hard to figure what either candidate’s impact will be since neither is offering full details of his spending programs.

"I think both candidates need to put some numbers on these things so we can get a sense of how realistic they are," said Robert Bixby of the Concord Coalition, a budget watchdog group.

Obama’s criticism of McCain’s pledge as "overly ambitious" is backed up by fiscal experts.

"Hypothetically it’s possible to get to a balanced budget by 2013, but not under the policies that McCain has proposed," Bixby said. "The policies he would propose would actually add to the deficit when you take them all together."

Jim Horney, director of federal fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the center’s analysis, even assuming a fast drawdown of troops in Iraq, found McCain would have to cut around $400 billion worth of federal programs to balance the budget by 2013.

“It seems unlikely, particularly given that Senator McCain has not been willing to be specific about what programs he would cut,” Horney said. “And even if he were willing to, there’s a real question of whether the Congress or the public would go along with the kinds of cuts required to balance the budget, assuming the tax policies that he’s proposing.”

McCain says he would reduce spending by slowing the growth of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but he hasn’t said how he would try to change the benefits. He also says he would slow the government’s spending growth and stop spending on lawmakers’ special earmarked projects. But earmarks accounted for just $17 billion of the $2.9 trillion budget this year.

Obama plans to raise $100 billion annually by increasing taxes on Americans making more than $250,000 a year, money that would be used to pay for health care and tax cuts for low- and middle-income earners. He has said ending the Iraq war would generate about $80 billion a year, but he’s not using that to pay down the deficit either. Instead, he said that money could help pay for more government programs like health care, education, housing and public safety.

"The problem there is that the Democrats have been very critical of President Bush for spending hundreds of billions of dollars on the war without paying for it and running up the deficit," Bixby said. "But in effect what Obama is saying is, `I’m going to spend the same amount of money. I’m just going to spend it on something else.’"

Obama’s economic policy director, Jason Furman, said the campaign will release a formal budget later in the year that explains his spending in greater detail. Furman added that “while we would like to balance the budget, we cannot say exactly when that will happen given the need to make important investments and the large amount of uncertainty in the economy.”

Bixby said even if Obama and McCain have ways to pay for their spending plans, the United States still has an unsustainable budget outlook because of rising costs for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

"It’s kind of like somebody building a porch on a house they can’t afford," he said. "This is the part of the budget that’s poised to explode over the next several years. And we really can’t afford all of these new initiatives that McCain and Obama are talking about because we haven’t figured out how to pay for what’s already on the table."

 

My View

At least McCain is attempting to get this country out of debt. At least McCain is not trying to increase the taxes for anyone. At least McCain is trying to cut all the wasteful pork that Washington spews out every year. At least McCain is trying to show people that living off of the government is not the way to go.

Obama on the other hand… He just wants more spending. If you though Bush was bad at spending money. Obama’s spending will DWARF that of Bush’s spending levels. People complain about how much Bush spent money, yet no one will complain about Obama’s spending. Remember the Government should NOT take care of you! 

To the people who for some reason are too blind too see Barack Hussein Obama is truly a Marxist, just look at his two year record. Is it Social Security and Welfare really worth the increase of taxes and debt? My point of view. I say anyone over 45 is guaranteed social security. Anyone under that age should get start putting money away, of course with tax incentives.

Also people living on welfare, they would have six months to get off or be out on the street. I know there are people that truly need the help, and they should be helped. I just want to get the people who don’t work or try to find a job off welfare. These people need to be held accountable for their own financial situation, and they shouldn’t rely on my tax dollars!

 

Socialist Security

Whats Going On?

Socialism+ Barack Obama= Poor Middle Class

Barack Hussein Obama was once the shining star of American Marxism. Barack Obama is a champion for a big, costly, but caring government. Only if you are a minority and don’t mind lots of taxes. Obama’s message of Chope (Change meeting Hope, the only two things he talks about) was giving mental orgasms to the liberals, but now their unwavering comrade is moving toward the center. The Marxist are slightly upset with him, but Obama is just doing what politicians do best. Flip-Flop.

How can this be? Barack Hussein Obama was supposed to be different from the idiots in Washington, yet here he is trying to change his views. Now Obama is supporting most of the faith based programs that Bush supported. Obama also agreed with the Supreme Courts ruling on the DC handgun band. I know what Barack Hussein Obama is doing. He is being a politician. He is no amazing movement leader that Obama and his group of drones want us to believe. He is an average, inexperienced, two year senator, and senators, as we all know, are naturally stupid people (Just look at Byrd)

I guess Obama’s message of Chope isn’t all what it was cracked up to be.

It wasn’t too hard to see that Obama was just an average politician. Look at how he handled the Reverend Wright issue. Yes I know that Howard Dean and John Kerry said that, any one that brings up the Rev. Wright issue is race baiting. Well I guess telling the truth is race baiting. Anyways, Obama handled that Rev. Wright situation sleazy politician.  As we all know, Obama supported and stood by Rev. Wright’s side. Obama said that Rev. Wright was is spiritual guide and baptized his children, but when Rev. Wright held that press conference. Barack Hussein Obama dropped Reverend Wright like a welfare-dependent-recipient drops a job, instantly.

Some liberals have the unisex genitalia to say that Obama never supported Rev. Wright. That Obama was proving that he was against Rev. Wright; however, we intelligent people know the truth. Barack Hussein Obama was just doing what politicians do when in trouble. Backstab friends, Lie, and spin the truth…